This blog consists of information I have collected from the professional development trainings I have attended and continue to attend throughout my career as well as information I received through my professional preparation program at California State University San Marcos. Within these pages you will find resources I have collected for all educators and anyone with an interest in History and/or Education.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Sociocultural Aspects of Schooling for ELs
An action that I will take for my social issue for students who are English Learners is to make my classroom more prepared for a test they are having on Friday. I think that it will be beneficial if they are given time to study, as one of my EL students mentioned to me that he is not passing my class because he doesn't know what is on the test, he doesn't have the time to study all the material we covered in the unit, so as a class we will be dedicating Thursday to review. This will give students time to ask questions and for my teacher and I to get down to the point of what our students should study for on the exam. It will be my mission to specifically integrate my EL students into the activity to make sure they understand what will be expected on the exam on Friday.
Monday, October 15, 2012
Lesson Planning
My lesson planning designing and planning incorporates the teenage brain by understanding how my students brains are still developing and what is needed to help them create an environment where they are able to grow their cortex's. This is achieved by utilizing the emotional approach with my students. Being able to have my students make important emotional connections between my curriculum and their lives is important to me, because the information I will share with them will stick inside their brains as it has some other memory it can attach to that is already in long term memory, helping them transition the information from short term memory to long term retention. I believe that having a "good things" session before the start of my lesson is important to students because they feel more comfortable in my class, as they can tell me what is going on in their lives, and what they are going through. That in turn can be used as a way to incorporate content, and during lectures, say "OK if your struggling with this think about what we talked about in good things, how does this fit into your life?" or just using one of my own memories as a teenager being able to say "Do any of you do this, because when I was your age I did it too" is important to me because your students see you as a human being that they can come to for advise.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Management plan
Management plan
My classroom
management plan is at is roots a Reconstructionist practice. A Social
Reconstructionist philosophy is defined as “an educational philosophy that
seeks to reconstruct society through education. A Social Reconstructionist
believes that students should be educated to change society” (Grant &
Gillette, 2005, P. 324). As a History & Social Studies teacher my goals for
my classes are to have students be able to apply the concepts in history to
their real lives. I believe in the power of my student’s minds and in their
ability to create social change within their own lives. It is my hope that they
will continue to create social change within their community, nation, and
world. In order for my students to attain a higher level of thinking students
must be afforded opportunities for trial and error. Life connections must be
made between the content in which the students are engaged and the lives my
students lead. Once this connection is
made students will begin to solve social problems within their own personal
lives and that their own trials by fire will be the basis for their knowledge.
Preventative Approach
As a teacher I
believe that classroom discipline thrives at the preventative approach. Being
able to stop problems before they start is vital to preventing problems in the
first place. I have found that a more assertive approach with the preventative
approach works the best. An assertive style of discipline is when “teachers
must establish rules and directions that clearly defined the limits of acceptable
and unacceptable student behavior” (canter, 2011, P. 65). An example of my
assertive approach would be having student expectations laid out from day one.
This will reduce a lot of disruption within my classroom. Another example is
that I will expect my students to complete their assigned reading every day and
come prepared to class with their questions, and debates ready to be discussed.
Students are expected to show respect to one another as well as to there
teacher. There teacher in return will provide a safe place in which to learn.
One of my favorite
quotes about my philosophy on the preventative approach is from Michael Douglas
in the movie The American President
“Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's
standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you
would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.” (Douglas,
2005). It is my job as an educator to get students to stand their ground on
issues they believe passionately in, however there is a difference between
passion and out right disrespect towards another’s views. Whatever the argument
that is made by my students, they must remember that at the end of the day we
are all human beings, and that makes us all have different perspectives on
different issues. You may not respect that person’s point of view, but it does
not give you the right to disrespect them.
Supportive Approach
The
supportive approach to me would be relying on my students parents, colleagues
and administrators to help me deal with issues within the classroom. Assertive
discipline again addresses the issue of support that matches how I feel running
my classroom properly “They expected school
administrators and students’ parents to support the system they advocated for”
(Canter,2011, P.65). I believe that it takes a village to raise a child, and
that all aspects of the child’s life should be involved in the support aspect
in classroom discipline. However, it is my ultimate responsibility to maintain
order within the classroom. One of the techniques I would use would be
continuing to “confidently and consistently model and express class
expectations” (Canter, 2011, P67). I believe that modeling good behavior
establishes good expectations not only for my students but also for myself. I
hold myself as accountable to the rules as I do my students. For a teacher to
do something as simple as admitting that they made a mistake, and redirecting
their students a few steps back is like pulling teeth. I feel that if you
exhibit confidence, even in your own mistakes you can help support students
confidence when they are in the middle of making their own mistakes. Most of
the time teachers like to bury there mistakes inside themselves in the hope
that on one will notice, but creating that wall is what looses our students
confidence, because once that wall goes up, there is no ownership over your own
mistakes, but if the authority figure in the classroom can own up to his
mistakes, then it breaks down the wall for the students to come out and admit
that they have made a mistake as well. Its easier to admit your mistakes, have
a laugh, and tri it again. Furthermore I believe that I can also support
students learning by having them find meaning in their education. Having
students find meaning in their education means being able to have student’s
complete assignments in ways that play to their strengths. Just because I ask
students to do an assignment a certain way doesn’t mean that that way is the
most appropriate, but rather asking students to do the assignments in ways that
1) cover my expectations for the assignments and 2) use students strengths will
create an atmosphere of finding meaning in education. This approach will allow
me to be able to “Shift from a focus on control to a focus on inquiry” (Towbin,
2010, p. 42-45). Seattle, WA:
Educational Leadership.) for my students.
Corrective Approach
For my Corrective Approach I
believe in three things. “There are three things you need to remember when
dealing with students who are at the corrective point of classroom discipline:
Tone, Volume, and Posture” (Smith, 2004, p. 56). I believe the tone, volume,
and posture of the teacher can exist on three different levels: playful,
concerned, and serious, a playful tone, volume, and posture indicates to the
students that you’re ok with their behavior and that your willing to entertain
it so far as it stays appropriate often times this is seen as goofy behavior
that is playful but not demeaning. A concerned tone, volume and posture means
that the students are starting to push your classroom limits with their
behavior and you fear that it may get out of control, There is no immediate
alarm, but feelings may start to begin getting hurt if the behavior continues so
the teacher takes a more concerned attitude towards what students are doing in
order to avoid a potential conflict often times this situation is addressed
with a simple “OK guys your starting in on that one a little to much, be
careful of other peoples feelings and reactions”. A serious tone, volume, and
posture means that situations need to be redirected and they have to know that
you are taking direct control of the situation because it will cause an unsafe
environment of you do not. Often time’s teachers will use a direct approach
with word as “you’ve crossed the line on that one, and you need to stop, now.”
Another great strategy that I believe in strongly is having active body
language. Active body language can mean anything from “proximity to signals and
gestures to Teaching pauses. “ (Kyle and Rogen, 2004, p.1) Using the strategies
listed above I believe reinforces my role as the teacher in the classroom. As I have stated before I am the authority in
the classroom, however that does not always mean I have to show direct
authority over students. Moving closer to a student who is talking makes them
quiet down or stop talking all together because they don’t necessarily want you
to hear what they are saying. If students continue to talk then you simply stop
your class, once the student notices that the attention is now focused on them,
often times they become shy and will not talk in the middle of class. This is a
golden opportunity to reexamine classroom procedures and rules for all of the
students so that the mistake is not done again. For students who struggle with
being called out directly in the middle of class, I can adjust to give them a
signal that they are being disruptive, this can be anything from a hand in the
air to a particular sound that is made, or a hand signal that the student and I
develop before the start of class.
Conclusion
I believe that all of these
techniques reflect on my philosophy. Being a Reconstructionist I believe that
social change beings with ones self. Taking a good look at who you are and how
you wish to change can mean a lot to people. It is my hope that my students
will go forward into the world and they will do something great with their
lives whatever they believe that is. I believe that good classroom management
begins with being an assertive teacher, putting your cards out on the table
from the start, admitting that you make mistakes, encouraging passion in
students, but also showing that humility an respect are must. Having
appropriate volume, tone, and posture for situations will create a safe
learning environment. I believe in being assertive because it will lead to a
safe place for students to come to when they need help with their decisions,
and that means a lot to my teaching ethnics and to me as a human being. I want
students to know that they can come to me with anything and that I will do my
best to provide them with a safe and caring environment in which to explore
them.
Sources:
Canter, L., & Canter, M.
(2011). Discipline through Assertive Tactics (p. 65). Boston, MA: Allyn
& Bacon.
Douglas, M. (Actor). (1995). The
American President [Motion picture]. Hollywood: Universal Pictures.
Grant, C. A., & Gillett, M.
(2005). Learning to teach everyone’s children: Equality, Empowerment and
Education that is Multicultural (p. 324). New York,
NY: Thomson & Wadsworth.
Towbin, J. (2012). When Students
Don't Play the Game (February 2012 ed., Vol. 67, pp. 42-45). Seattle,
WA: Educational Leadership.
Kyle, P., & Rogien, L. (2004). CLASSROOM
MANAGEMENT: CORRECTIVE STRATEGIES (p. 1). Bethesda, MD: National
Association of School psychologist.
Smith, R. (2004). Conscious
Classroom Management (p. 56). San Rafael, CA: Conscious Teacher
Publications.
Monday, October 1, 2012
SDAIE Lesson Plan Code of Hammurabi
1. TITLE OF THE LESSON: Vocabulary Within document analysis
|
2. CURRICULUM AREA & GRADE LEVEL: 9th grade honors World History
|
3A. STUDENT INFORMATION:
English Language Learners
1.) Readiness Level: 2 redesigned ELD students. (Advanced)
2.) Learning Profile Great writing for level, minor grammar difficulties
able to keep up with classroom use of SADIE strategies.
3.) Interest Student #1 enjoys going to the beach, dancing, and
running. Student #2 enjoy speaking to friends, yet not in front of class both
students are in band, and student #1 is in afterschool sports for the school.
|
3B. STUDENT INFORMATION: Students
w/ Special Needs
1.) Readiness Level: No students in this class have IEP’s or 504 plans.
2.) Learning Profile:
3.) Interest:
|
4. RATIONALE
A. Enduring Understanding
Students need to understand
the document analysis of SOAPStone. This technique will help heighten a
student’s skills base needed for Advanced Placement classes later in there
high school careers as well as help in future post-high school document
analysis organization at the university level.
B. Essential Question(s):
What does SOAPStone look
like and how can I apply it to historical documents?
C. Reason for Instructional Strategies
and Student Activities
Students are reading The
Code of Hammurabi. They must be able to analyze the text of the poem to
learn the Speaker, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, Subject and tone
(SOAPStone)of the poem. Once understanding SOAPStone organization students
will be able to answer Point of View questions, the student need to establish
what each of these initials means within an article. We will be covering the
vocabulary of SOAPStone within Point of View (PoV) statements, students will
identify the Who, What, Where, and Why The Code of Hammurabi. Once PoV
statements have been identified students will be able to identify bias within
the document. Once bias has been identified students will then be able to categorize
the document with in the Political, Intellectual, Geographic, Social,
Economic, Artistic, and Religious (PIGSEAR) thesis groupings. Once PIGSEAR
groupings have been categorized, students will be able to identify what
material is missing from the document.
|
|
5. CONTENT STANDARD(S)
10.2.1
Compare the major ideas of philosophers and their effects on the democratic
revolutions in England,
the US,
France
and Latin America
|
6. ELD STANDARD(S) Reading
comprehension: Cluster 2: Advanced Identify strategies used by media to
present information for various purposes (e.g., to inform, entertain, or
persuade).
|
7. LEARNING GOAL(S) -
OBJECTIVE(S)
Cognitive: After identifying concepts of the document
using SOAPStone, students will be able to break down the code of Hammurabi
into the SOAPStone pieces as well as provide examples of the Point of View,
check for Bias in the document, categorize the information into PIGSEAR
thesis groupings, and provide what is missing from the document.
|
8. ASSESSMENT(S)
A. Diagnostic/Entry Level: This is a do now assignment, which helps me see where
students are in their reading comprehension and ability to identify context
clues. Also this will display what reading level the students are at and what
vocabulary is difficult for class.
B. Formative-Progress Monitoring: Class meets and collaborates as a group to go
over every group’s interpretation. This will allow each student to think
about other interpretive techniques and they will be able to apply these to
future texts.
C. Summative: Class writing individual summaries in order to
reflect on what they read and what techniques they used. Also students will
write their own definition along with their own unique sentences for each
unfamiliar vocabulary word. This will help reaffirm their familiarity with
the new words.
|
9A. EXPLANATION OF
DIFFERENTIATION FOR
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
1.) Content/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest
Team up with native English
speaking peers during think-pair-share with ELLs. Have ELLs identify what
words are unfamiliar to them and they will have a partner to help explain
definitions as well as a dictionary.
2.) Process/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest
The process of breaking down
sentences and looking up new words should help improve their readiness in
reading comprehension. ELL students will not feel singled out for special
treatment as they will be able to complete the assignment with the regular
students.
3.) Product/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest
They are allowed to practice
social skills with their peers during think-pair-share.
|
9B. EXPLANATION OF
DIFFERENTIATION FOR
STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL
NEEDS
1.) Content/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest: This will provide the
students with different strategies that will help them analyze future
readings.
2.) Process/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest: Taking the information one
paragraph at a time will help students who struggle with lecture based
assignments break down the information into smaller chunks. Group based work
will allow students to chunk and chew information
3.) Product/Based on Readiness, Learning Profile or
Interest: Think pair share will
allow for social dynamic relations
|
10. INSTRUCTIONAL
STRATEGIES
A. Anticipatory Set/Into
Content
objectives for daily objective in social science will be clearly displayed on
the whiteboard with green ink.
Students will read the
article once as a class. Teacher will explain the SOAPStone, POV, Bias,
PIGSEAR groupings, and what’s missing on the document analysis (green) sheet.
Teacher will open a discussion to answer question regarding the vocabulary
within the SOAPStone model and how it applies to an historical text. (10
Minutes)
B. Instruction/Through
Students will pair up with a
neighbor and share what they believed the article was about. Students will
then gather into groups of four and get out the document analysis sheet from
there binders. Teacher will supply extra copies to students who have
misplaced there document analysis sheet. The teacher will then model to
students how to identify the Speaker, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, Subject
and Tone (SOAPStone), PoV statements, Bias, Placement within PIGSEAR
groupings and what’s missing within the article. Teacher will monitor groups
who have good ideas and let them know you will ask them to share their ideas
in order to ensure good techniques are added to the group share out at the
conclusion of the lesson. (20 minutes)
C. Guided Practice/Through
The teacher will assist
groups who struggle to comprehend
assignment by pointing out context clues within The Hammurabi code.
D. Independent Practice/Through
The teacher will monitor the
groups to makes sure on task behavior is being enforced.
E. Closure
The teacher will go through SOAPStone,
POV, Bias, PIGSEAR groupings, and what’s missing within The Hammurabi code
on the document camera for all students to see. Teacher will call upon
students who were told have good techniques as well as those who may have
struggled with the assignment to ensure comprehension. (10 minutes)
F. Beyond
Request to see notes on
assignments to monitor reading skills advancement. Continue with SOAPStone
practice with different documents and vocabulary words later in the week.
Inform students that a document analysis will be on their unit test.
|
11. STUDENT
ACTIVITIES
A. Anticipatory Set/Into
Student will read content
objective on whiteboard to focus the class on the daily objective.
Follow along and listen to
the teacher read the story and instructions. Follow along and listen to
teacher review document analysis sheet. Student will take notes identifying
each vocabulary word.
B. Instruction/Through
Explain ideas to partner during
Think-pair-share on what entire article is talking about. Discuss what words
each student did not understand and talk about what clues are in the text to
help with definitions.
C. Guided Practice/Through
Students collaborate ideas through
think-pair-share on what words mean.
D. Independent Practice/Through
Prepare ideas to contribute to group
discussion.
E. Closure
Copy ideas not already on paper from
doc cam onto paper
F. Beyond
The list of techniques can
help students with future readings the need to analyze and understand. Also
they will have their document analysis sheet to refer to throughout the year.
|
12. RESOURCES
Building success Document Analysis, The code of
Hammurabi
|
This rubric will help
assist students with their categorizing of SOAPStone, PIGSEAR, Point Of View
(POV) statements, bias, and what’s missing from an historical document. This
assignment with this rubric will be introduced during the anticipatory activity
as well as displayed during the guided and independent practice. Students will receive
a hard copy of the rubric for the closure activity so that they may self-assess
their work.For ELD students
Think-Pair-Share has worked in the past for them to understand the concepts
being taught.
Rubric for assignment
Tutoring assistance
needed.
|
Basic comprehension of
the text
|
Intermediate Comprehension
of text
|
At grade level Comprehension
of text
|
Advanced Knowledge of the
text
|
1 or 0; Examples provided
are unrelated to activity’s purpose
|
2 or more; Fair amount of
aspects of the SOAPStone groupings are present from the text
|
3 or more; Sufficient aspects
of the SOAPStone groupings are present from text
|
4 or more; Numerous aspects
of the SOAPStone groupings are present from the text
|
5 or more; Not only are All
aspects of the SOAPStone are present
with specific examples from the text, but examples are well grounded and plentiful
within the activity
|
1 or 0; Examples provided
are unrelated to activity’s purpose
|
2 or more; Fair amount of
aspects of the SOAPStone groupings are present from the text.
|
3 or more; Sufficient
aspects of PIGSEAR groupings are present.
|
4 or more; Numerous
aspects of PIGSEAR groupings are present.
|
5 or more; All relevant aspects
of PIGSEAR groupings are present with explanation
|
1 or 0; Examples provided
are unrelated to activity’s purpose
|
2 or more; Fair amount of
aspects of the SOAPStone groupings are present from the text.
|
3 or more; Sufficient
aspects of PIGSEAR groupings are provided.
|
4 or more; Numerous
aspects of POV Statements provided
|
5 or more; A specific POV
statement is provided and has been addressed with references to PIGSEAR
groupings.
|
1 or 0; Examples of bias
are not present or are unrelated to activities purpose
|
2 or more; A fair amount of
bias has been identified
|
3 or more; Sufficient
aspects of bias have been identified
|
4 or more; Numerous
aspects of bias have been identified
|
5 or more; Specific
aspects of bias have been addressed
|
1 or 0; Examples of what
is missing are not present or are unrelated to the activities purpose.
|
2 or more; A fair amount
of what is missing from the activity have been identified
|
3 or more; Sufficient
aspects of what is missing from the activity have been identified
|
4 or more; Numerous
aspects of what is missing from the activity have been identified
|
5 or more; Specific
aspects of what the article is missing have been Identified and addressed.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)